• Articles

    Benefits of an analog education

    The world you were born in no longer exists. 

    When I was a child, thousands of years ago, the world was still mostly analog. 

    I listened to vinyl records and tapes. 

    I had a walkman. That was considered a great innovation back then.

    Sometimes the tape got stuck and you needed to rewind it with a pen.

    We had rotary phones at home. We used pay phones when we needed to call someone if we were outside. 

    We took pictures with film cameras that you had to take to the lab to see how they came out. We did not have social media, so we could just show the photos to family or close friends. Nobody else saw them. 

    I had the privilege of shooting short movies with a 35 mm camera, and working with film projectors.  

    I still love the sound of film rolling. 

    The first computer I had, you had to load the game by playing a tape. 

    That had an interesting sound too. 

    The second computer I had, you had green letters on a black screen, and no Windows. 

    Today, all that is gone, of course. 

    Social media, smartphones and now AI have changed things.

    But is it good?

    First of all, I would like to make one thing clear. Artificial Intelligence is a misnomer. There is no intelligence involved. Certainly no conscience or volition. I think automation is a better term. 

    In some ways, automation will make things easier. But in other ways, it will make things more complicated. 

    Of course it will also end with a lot of jobs, especially for people in the low end of the curve. 

    It’s interesting that at the same time that they develop AI, they are bringing in a lot of uneducated migrants for jobs they will no longer have.

    Or will they? Some jobs still cannot be made by automation, or it’s cheaper to hire people at very low costs. 

    One effect it will have, I think, is that most people will no longer know how to write properly. It will do for writing what calculators did for math. You need a letter or a paper for school? Let ChatGPT do it. 

    Now, I don’t think that’s a very big problem, because most people can’t write anyway. Before, students would copy from encyclopedias or from each other, now they use ChatGPT. Garbage in, garbage out. 

    I think the real problem, and you see that already, is a huge proliferation of bad-quality writing. Lots of people who, not knowing how to write, try to create an essay or even a novel using one of those automated systems.  

    Lots of things on the Internet are already texts written by bots. It’s possible that a lot of journalism will be replaced by AI, if it isn’t already. There’s not a lot of skill involved in writing news.

    The same goes for AI art. It’s proliferating everywhere. I don’t think it’s good. 

    But I think one good effect of AI art is that it also creates a backlash. It is bringing back people interested in the traditional arts. I recently started oil painting, and there are quite a lot of interesting videos right now about classic painting, and lots of people interested in them.

    One of the things I liked about the recent Beetlejuice sequel was that most of the effects were practical. Masks, puppets, even stop-motion. 

    I think a lot of people enjoyed that. 

    But back to the topic. I think that the real main problem with automation is that it will most likely lead to a new form of autocratic government. 

    Technologies such as facial recognition will be able to track you and pinpoint you everywhere. 

    With digital cash, they will be able to see everything you spend, and freeze your accounts if such is needed. 

    Other technologies will track everything you do, write or even think. 

    It’s simply inevitable. There are already cars that, while not yet fully automated, won’t allow you to go above the road’s speed limit. If you do so, it will automatically send your data and location to the nearest police station. 

    Technology does many things, some good, some bad, but in general it does not lead to greater freedom. Most people were freer when they lived in the countryside or in the middle ages.

    It’s not a coincidence that most dystopias, such as 1984 or Brave New World, involved some form of technological control.

    But things are what they are. I’m not sure you can put the technological genie back in the bottle. 

    As, for me, sometimes I think, what would have happened if technology had simply frozen to what we had in the 1980s or 1990s? Would that be so bad? Is life so much better today than it was back then? Are we happier? Are we more productive? 

    I don’t know. My own impression is that life was better in the 1990s. But it could be just nostalgia.

  • Articles

    The Internet is dead

    “AI” killed the Internet star

    You know what, I miss the 1990s. All the way up to the early 2000s. And not just because I was young in that period. It’s not just nostalgia. Those years were objectively better. There were great movies (too many to list), great music (many great bands from the 1980s still active and many good new ones), even great sitcoms — I’ve recently re-watched “Spaced”, a classic British sitcom from 1999-2000, and I still found it funny and endearing, although in that case it could be just nostalgia: I did live in London in those years, after all).

    But, more importantly, in those times the so-called Internet was just beginning to show its vast potential.

    We called it the “world wide web” back then. I think no one uses this expression anymore. (I know the “web” and “Internet” technically refer to different things, but anyway, the point is that no one says “world wide web” or even “www” anymore.)

    Up until 2010 or so, the main form of publishing was blogging. You set up a blog with Blogger or WordPress, and voilà. You could get thousands of readers. Sometimes friendships were formed. And you could find a lot of free, interesting and uncensored information.

    No one uses Blogger or WordPress anymore. Now there’s mostly social media: Facebook, Instagram. Even Twitter became “X”, one of the worst rebrands ever.

    It’s not the same thing at all. Now everything is controlled, spied, branded, censored.

    For former bloggers, there is Substack, but it’s also not really the same thing. For one, it is really an email newsletter, not a blog. And two, perhaps because of the competition with the other companies that monopolize searching, most Substack sites are really hard to find.

    Speaking of Google: it became much worse. It is really hard to find anything useful sometimes. I’m not sure if it’s because their search engine got worse or simply because there is a lot more material online these days.

    Youtube got much worse too, especially since they started to censor people heavily during the Covid era. The most interesting creators migrated to other platforms. A lot of the videos now are very commercial. Gone are the days when any Youtuber could become a star just doing random videos without any major corporate support.

    But all that was before “AI”, of course. The new type of software that some misname “intelligence” was the killing shot.

    If “video killed the radio star“, then AI killed the Internet.

    I am not sure of the exact percentages, but a lot of texts you find online today, probably the majority, are written by bots. Just google any article about anything. Everything seems written by ChatGPT or a similar software. And as such, everything reads exactly the same. More than once I located two articles in different sites but with an identical text. I guess both authors used the same bot. Lots of commenters are bots, too.

    Image search was also contaminated by the so-called “AI art”. Google “baby peacock“, for instance, and at least half of the resulting images will be ugly, unrealistic digital images created by one of those bots.

    (The other day I watched “Beetlejuice Beetlejuice”, the sequel to Tim Burton’s 1988’s classic, and one of the good things about it was that most of the effects were, like in the 1980s/90s, practical effects, make-up or stop-motion. Little CGI, and certainly no random “AI art”.)

    Alas, “AI” is going to be ever more present in our lives. It is going to “curate” all of our online experience (and not only), so that you don’t risk running into some dangerous “conspiracy theory” blogger, or, God forbid, a text or an image created by a real person from scratch, and not merely recycled from data fed to a “software language model”. You’ll have to get used to use facial recognition to get into a self-driving car that you will pay with a scan of your retina, the whole shebang. It is sold as a utopia, but those of us who grew up in the 1980s and 1990s know better. We watched all those old sci-fi movies. We know how they end.


    While I decide what to do with my own personal creations in a new Internet that has little space for them, I leave you with two little gifts.

    One is my recent documentary about Finland, “Dreaming of Finland”, linked below. The few people who have followed this blog — or well, newsletter — know that I visited Finland last year and wrote about it. Well, now there’s a film about it too. It even has some 90s style stop-motion.

    The other is Geist magazine, an independent (very independent!) magazine of literature and art that I occasionally publish. There is a new issue, number 6, Fall 2024, that just came out this past Halloween. You can read a preview here or just order an old-fashioned print copy in full colour and quality paper at our online shop here.

    Thank you.

  • Art - Featured - Memories

    “AI” killed the Internet star

    You know what, I miss the 1990s. All the way up to the early 2000s. And not just because I was young in that period. It’s not just nostalgia. Those years were objectively better. There were great movies (too many to list), great music (many great bands from the 1980s still active and many good new ones), even great sitcoms — I’ve recently re-watched “Spaced”, a classic British sitcom from 1999-2000, and I still found it funny and endearing, although in that case it could be just nostalgia: I did live in London in those years, after all).

    But, more importantly, in those times the so-called Internet was just beginning to show its vast potential.

    We called it the “world wide web” back then. I think no one uses this expression anymore. (I know the “web” and “Internet” technically refer to different things, but anyway, the point is that no one says “world wide web” or even “www” anymore.)

    Up until 2010 or so, the main form of publishing was blogging. You set up a blog with Blogger or WordPress, and voilà. You could get thousands of readers. Sometimes friendships were formed. And you could find a lot of free, interesting and uncensored information.

    No one uses Blogger or WordPress anymore. Now there’s mostly social media: Facebook, Instagram. Even Twitter became “X”, one of the worst rebrands ever.

    It’s not the same thing at all. Now everything is controlled, spied, branded, censored.

    For former bloggers, there is Substack, but it’s also not really the same thing. For one, it is really an email newsletter, not a blog. And two, perhaps because of the competition with the other companies that monopolize searching, most Substack sites are really hard to find.

    Speaking of Google: it became much worse. It is really hard to find anything useful sometimes. I’m not sure if it’s because their search engine got worse or simply because there is a lot more material online these days.

    Youtube got much worse too, especially since they started to censor people heavily during the Covid era. The most interesting creators migrated to other platforms. A lot of the videos now are very commercial. Gone are the days when any Youtuber could become a star just doing random videos without any major corporate support.

    AI killed the Internet star

    But all that was before “AI”, of course. The new type of software that some misname “intelligence” was the killing shot.

    If “video killed the radio star“, then AI killed the Internet.

    I am not sure of the exact percentages, but a lot of texts you find online today, probably the majority, are written by bots. Just google any article about anything. Everything seems written by ChatGPT or a similar software. And as such, everything reads exactly the same. More than once I located two articles in different sites but with an identical text. I guess both authors used the same bot. Lots of commenters are bots, too.

    Image search was also contaminated by the so-called “AI art”. Google “baby peacock“, for instance, and at least half of the resulting images will be ugly, unrealistic digital images created by one of those bots.

    (The other day I watched “Beetlejuice Beetlejuice”, the sequel to Tim Burton’s 1988’s classic, and one of the good things about it was that most of the effects were, like in the 1980s/90s, practical effects, make-up or stop-motion. Little CGI, and certainly no random “AI art”.)

    Alas, “AI” is going to be ever more present in our lives. It is going to “curate” all of our online experience (and not only), so that you don’t risk running into some dangerous “conspiracy theory” blogger, or, God forbid, a text or an image created by a real person from scratch, and not merely recycled from data fed to a “software language model”. You’ll have to get used to use facial recognition to get into a self-driving car that you will pay with a scan of your retina, the whole shebang. It is sold as a utopia, but those of us who grew up in the 1980s and 1990s know better. We watched all those old sci-fi movies. We know how they end.


    While I decide what to do with my own personal creations in a new Internet that has little space for them, I leave you with two little gifts.

    One is my recent documentary about Finland, “Dreaming of Finland”, linked below. The few people who have followed this blog — or well, newsletter — know that I visited Finland last year and wrote about it. Well, now there’s a film about it too. It even has some 90s style stop-motion.

    The other is Geist magazine, an independent (very independent!) magazine of literature and art that I occasionally publish. There is a new issue, number 6, Fall 2024, that just came out this past Halloween. You can read a preview here or just order an old-fashioned print copy in full colour and quality paper at our online shop here.

    Thank you.

  • Articles - Books - Featured - Russia

    “Everything is allowed”

    There’s a lot of doom in the Internet, especially among the alternative news crowd. People can’t get enough of the “end of the world/end of the West” type of thing. While I do understand that we are living in highly worrying times, with war expanding everywhere, economic downturn, birth rate collapse, mass migration, and radical technological and social changes, I try to avoid falling in the trap of looking only at the collapse, as there are occasionally good things too. Besides, it’s a bit depressive to only having to write about doom, gloom and conspiracy theories.

    Recently I’ve been doing much more reading than writing — I haven’t published a text here in months — and I decided to revisit classic novels, reading or re-reading them. I started, where else, with the Russians. I’ve recently finished Dostoevsky’s “The Brothers Karamazov” — it took me only forty years. I kid, but in fact I started reading this novel when I was 16 or 17, and never finished it. Then a few months ago, I found the book in my local library and decided to pick it up again, reading it all from the start. It took me just a couple of months. I really enjoyed it, so much so that I am reading Dostoevsky’s “The Idiot” now.

    The following is a somewhat disjointed digression about a famous sentence found in the Karamazov book — the text can also be watched in video form, perhaps it works better this way — and how it could apply to our current reality. Or not.


    “If there is no God, everything is allowed.”

    This sentence that became famous appears in the great novel by Fyodor Dostoevsky, “The Brothers Karamázov”, one of the greatest novels in the history of literature. A great, great book which I’ve only recently read. Without giving any spoilers, let’s just say that it is the story of three brothers with three very different personalities and destinies. Dmitri is the impulsive and reckless one, Alyosha is the moral and good-hearted one, and Ivan is the intellectual and cynical one. And Ivan is the one who says this sentence.

    But what does it mean?

    It means that without God there are no moral rules, and man can do anything he wants. Rape, incest, murder.

    “Do what thou wilt, that shall be the law”.

    There are two consequences to this. One is that moral notions of good and evil have to come from God, from above. Otherwise it just comes from one man to another group of men, and it becomes merely a question of power.

    The second part is that you should have clear, inflexible rules.”Thou shall not murder.” “Thou shall not covet thy neighbours’ wife”.  Otherwise, you have relativism. Or things like utilitarianism: “the greater good for the greater number of people”.

    But then, if you have four people and three of them don’t like the fourth one, they can kill him, because that would be “the greater good for the greater number of people”, right?

    And so we are back to “Everything is allowed.”

    This idea comes, a bit, from Nietzsche’s sentence that “God is dead”, and the growing nihilism that was already at the time very noticeable in society, not just in Russia but in Europe in general. We are talking here about the late 19th century, when science was advancing, society was changing and more traditional notions of behaviour were starting to disappear.

    The 20th century saw even greater changes, with feminism, the sexual revolution, the rise of modern democracy, and the further secularization of society, as well as incredible technological changes.

    Today, things have gone much further. We live in times of extreme moral confusion, or maybe we should even say moral inversion. Good is called bad, and bad is called good. Black is called white, and white, black. Women are called men and men are called women.

    Since we can’t even accept Nature as it is, the rules of society have become increasingly nonsensical.

    As people are increasingly stabbed in the streets by foreigners, governments worldwide react by banning knives. Or scissors. Or hammers.

    Or social media posts.

    Newspapers were always full of lies, but, with the rise of modern digital mass media and now what is called, incorrectly, “Artificial Intelligence”, which further increases the possibilities of image manipulation, we don’t even know what is real and what isn’t. Perhaps we never knew. History was always written by the winners. Not everything we were told in school and history books was true.

    Our leaders, the ones who should rule us and protect us, have become our worst enemies. There have always been tyrants, but this is probably the first time in history where there’s a whole worldwide government system that hates its population, or, at most, sees humans as replaceable cogs in a machine. Animals with no souls, to be hacked by vaccines and gene manipulation.

    Even religious leaders offer little solace. Most of them are also part of this global system that wants to destroy traditional society in the name of a new global order.

    What to do? How can we get rid of this evil global that seems to increasingly control everything and lead us into a global technological dystopia?

    In Dostoevski’s novel, there is another character, called Father Zossima, a monk who is the mentor of the young Alyosha. And he says some interesting things which may be worth repeating.

    At one point omeone asks him, “How can you prove that God exists?” And he says, well, you can’t. But if you love everyone and everything, if you spend your life actively loving your neighbours, one day, you will understand. But he warns that such love has to be active, real love.

    Because the truth, as Dostoevsky observes in the novel, is that many people love humanity in the abstract, but they don’t really love humans. They just love a certain notion that they have about humanity, or perhaps they just love the idea of being considered a “good person”.

    And so you have a lot of what we call virtue-signallers. People who like to appear as if they are noble or good and are always fighting for the right causes. But it is just status-mongering. It’s not real love. They love humanity as an abstract concept. But loving real people is hard. Most people are annoying or ungrateful. They lie, they cheat, they stink. When Jesus said that you should love your neighbour, he never said it would be easy.

    Father Zossima also asks: “what is Hell?” And he says something very interesting. He says, “I maintain that Hell is the suffering of being unable to love.” And if we think about our rulers — and I don’t mean just the politicians, but the billionaires, the bankers, the real rulers behind the façade of the state — we see a lot of people that have a lot of power and riches. They have yachts, mansions, cars, women. But despite that, many of them don’t seem happy, and in fact many seem really wretched.  “What does it profit a man to win the whole world and lose his soul?”

    They may have power, but they are unable to love their fellow human beings. And as such, they are in fact already living in hell. Because Hell is the suffering of being unable to love. If God’s love is the hidden grammar of the Universe, then Hell is being permanently away from it.

    So what is the answer to our current troubles? The same one that ever was. Reject excessive materialism and consumerism. Try to avoid mass media, or, if you can’t at least be skeptical about it. Work, love your family, love the people close to you, help your community. Try to change yourself before attempting to change the world.

    The current system is based on lies, and, as such, it can’t last long. It will end at some point, perhaps sooner than we all think. As Yeats said, “All things fall and are built again.” When the time comes, we have to be ready to build them again.

  • Articles - Featured - Italy

    Notes from the end of the liberal order: Firenze

    Godi, Fiorenza, poi che se’ sì grande,
    che per mare e per terra batti l’ali,
    e per lo ’nferno tuo nome si spande!

    (Dante, Inferno, Canto XXVI)

    The Americans

    After Spain, I came to Florence, for a brief course. I’m staying in a monastery of benedictine nuns that rents rooms, located right at the edge of town. Wonderful place with a wonderful view. The only thing ruining it so far is a small group of young, loud, obnoxious American tourists staying here as well.

    If I had my way, I would impose a moratorium of ten years for American tourists anywhere in Europe. Maybe a hundred years just in case, although it’s pretty unlikely that America as such will still exist in a hundred years.

    I may sound prejudiced, but if it wasn’t for America, Europe would be not an Uncle Sam colony, the Middle East would not be constantly being bombed with its refugees ending up in Europe, and extreme liberal ideas would not kept being pushed everywhere.

    Twice in my life I saw American tourists breaking spaghetti in half to cook it, under the horrified look of an Italian. I also saw once an American cooking spaghetti in a frying pan together with the vegetables and the sauce.

    But it’s not that they commit such culinary heresies. It’s their attitude. Ignorance is forgivable, but Americans believe that they are right even when they are wrong. When an Italian points out their mistake, they don’t really accept that it is a mistake, or perhaps they don’t even understand it. They laugh and think that the Italians are oversensitive foodies.

    They just cannot understand that things in other countries are done for a reason.

    Americans will not drink tap water in Italy, or anywhere outside of the U.S. It’s unsafe, they say. But, outside of India and Pakistan, it’s probably in the U.S. where tap water is the most dangerous.

    It’s not that it’s unclean. It’s not what they take away — it’s all that they put in. From fluoride to lithium to who knows what else, American tap water has more chemicals than the periodic table.

    While in the U.S. water fluoridation has been ongoing since the 1960s, polluting our precious bodily fluids (under the excuse of fighting tooth decay), in Italy, tap water has never been fluoridated. Nevertheless, according to a recent report, Italian children have less cavities than their American counterparts.

    What was the true motive for water fluoridation, then?

    Who knows, but don’t ask an American. He still believes in the official stories of 9/11, JFK, Covid, the moon landing, and, of course, water fluoridation.

    The Africans

    There’s a park in Florence where African migrants hang around, loitering, listening to loud rap, selling drugs and counterfeit bags. There’s probably a similar park in most European cities nowadays.

    In Barcelona, Latin Americans and Moroccans comprised most of the non-native population, but in Florence, after the American tourists, Africans seem to be the most visible foreign presence in the city. But, alas, unlike the former, the latter won’t go back to their countries as summer ends. Italy is stuck with them.

    Of course, there are also other Africans who integrate into the formal economy and work as waiters, bus drivers, nurses, lifesavers, and so on, but still, each day a new boat arrives and there’s no room for all, so some overflow into the parks.

    I mean, they are not dangerous, at least not so far, but they don’t seem to contribute much to the local economy, unless selling cheap counterfeit bags made by the Chinese counts as a contribution.

    The Chinese

    Which brings me to the Chinese. They are also numerous, but, being less loud than the Africans, they are not so noticed. They also concentrate in particular regions. It seems that Prato is almost half Chinese now. I wouldn’t know, I haven’t been there yet, but I can believe it.

    The Chinese at least are industrious and don’t tend to idly hang around in parks. They are good at doing business, and they do it from morning to night. The Jews of Asia, they say, although that might be an unfair characterization for both sides.

    It seems that a lot of “Italian” trinkets sold in souvenir shops, even if they say “made in Italy”, are made by the Chinese. In this case, Chinese migrants in Prato.

    But I like the Chinese. Once, and I told the story here before, a Chinese migrant gave me a ride to my hotel when there were no longer taxis or other form of transportation in town, and wouldn’t even accept money for it. I don’t think an American tourist would have done that.

    Also, I was confident enough to take a ride with a random Chinese migrant, but I don’t think I would if he was from any other nationality. Chinese and other Asians are trustworthy in that sense. I mean, I suppose that there are Chinese robbers, rapists, murderers or serial killers, but it’s not the first thing that comes to your mind.

    The Italians

    Now, first of all, let’s admit it, there is no such things as an “Italian people”. They don’t really exist. There’s Tuscans — subdivided in Florentines, Senese, Pisans, etc. — and Lombards, and Neapolitans, and Sicilians, and Sardinians, and so on.

    Don’t tell me that all of those groups form a single, unified people, regardless of what Garibaldi said.

    The Tuscans, and, in particular, the Florentines, are considered snobbish or arrogant, a bit like, say, the Parisians in France. “Hanno la puzza sotto il naso“, they say here. —they have their nose always turned up.

    There might be something to it, even though I haven’t noticed it. Curzio Malaparte, himself a Tuscan from Prato, wrote in “Maledetti Toscani” that Tuscans are the smartest people in Italy and that they do not suffer fools gladly, and that makes them hated by all the other Italians.

    That has not been my experience at all. If anything, the Tuscans I’ve met have been pretty kind, generous and even humble, very far from such stereotype.

    (I do think that might be true of the people of Milan, though.).

    The Liberal (Dis)Order

    Like in Spain, the Italian birth rate is also collapsing. Feminist propaganda is also very present, almost as much as in Spain. Wherever there’s feminism and liberalism, there’s birth rate collapse. Of course, there are many other reasons for it, as the phenomenon is present today in most countries, not all liberal democracies, but feminism, late marriages (or no marriage), abortion and birth control certainly play a role. After all, it’s women the ones who have (or do not have) babies.

    But the real problem of modern liberalism is simply that it doesn’t have an end or a goal — it just evolves to and further further radicalism, at the same time that it describes its critics as “radicals”.

    For instance, “Pope” Francis recently excommunicated his critic Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò, whom the media characterizes as “ultra-conservative”. But Viganò’s position is simply the same of any regular Catholic priest in 1962, prior to Vatican II. There’s nothing “radical” or “extreme” about it. It’s society, and the Church with it, which became more extreme, and continues to do so.

    And remember when Meloni was characterized as “far-right”? That didn’t age well.

    The other strange thing about the liberal order (some may call it the “new world order”) is how omnipresent it is. There is little room for variation. From increasing censorship in the name of “misinformation” to strange and possibly fake election results, it follows the same pattern of tricks everywhere.

    And yet, also here in Florence as in Barcelona, collapse does not seem to be coming any time soon. The city, despite the heat in these infernal summer months — certainly an inspiration for Dante — is bustling with activity and tourists. Not just loud, obnoxious Americans, but also obnoxious Germans, obnoxious Australians, obnoxious French.

    Dante wrote ironically that Florence’s fame grows even in Hell — in fact his Inferno is basically a list of famous florentines — and predicted that a great calamity sooner or later would strike the city as punishment for its many sins.

    Well, I suppose we’re more or less in the same situation in the West as a whole. Punishment will come, that much is certain. But who knows exactly when?

  • Featured - Spain

    Notes from the end of the liberal order: Spain

    I don’t know if anyone noticed, but I haven’t written much here. I spent the past couple of weeks visiting family in Spain, reading Brothers Karamazov1 on the beach and trying to forget about the state of the world. I was staying on a smaller location, about 20 minutes by train from downtown Barcelona, in a coastal region called El Maresme.

    And yet, how can you completely escape from the world? Even if you escape from it, it follows you. The local newspaper that I picked up at the nearby cafe, La Vanguardia, informed me that the Spanish birthrate has collapsed and that it is not going to come up again any time soon. Spanish people are just not having children or even marrying and, according to a recent study, in a decade or so a third of the households in Spain will be single-person.

    Meanwhile, migrants keep coming and while right now 21% of the residents of Catalonia are foreign-born — and that’s not counting those of migrant background but already born in Spain. This is likely to grow. More migrants will be coming, mostly from Morocco and Subsaharan Africa, but there are many coming from Latin America too. In fact, I was surprised at how many Latin Americans are there in Barcelona compared to 20 or even just 10 years ago.

    And yet, in a building just across from one of Gaudi’s masterpieces, I watched a conference by a famous Spanish journalist. At one point he said that “in the next decades, migrants from Africa and North Africa will comprise most of our population”, or something to that effect, but in a matter-of-factly tone. No one blinked. Everyone seemed to accept it as a given.

    And yet, when I looked at the audience, it was all white Spanish people — and mostly older folks too.

    Isn’t there a contradiction here?

    People expect that Spain will have a completely different population in fifty years, and things will work exactly the same way, but the audience seemed to show otherwise. Migrants don’t tend to go to Spanish journalists’ conferences. In the future, Spain — and large parts of Europe — will resemble more and more Latin America or perhaps North Africa in its dysfunction.

    And yet… Many right-wingers talk about such things as if society was on the verge of collapse, but I think that’s just exaggeration, or perhaps wishful thinking. Most countries in Latin America or North Africa haven’t collapsed yet. European countries seem still pretty chill, regardless of the occasional random “terrorist” attack (and some of those are probably staged by CIA/Mossad).

    It’s true that the current world order is mostly based on strange lies or utopian ideas — that all people are equal and replaceable, that sex differences don’t exist, that we need to wear masks to avoid viruses and suck carbon from the atmosphere and cut trees to “solve climate change” etc etc — and, as such, it cannot really go on forever. Nevertheless, it can still last for quite a while. After all, it took hundreds of years for the Roman Empire to fall. The Fall of the American Global Empire may take an even longer time.

    I don’t even think migration is the main problem in Spain. That would probably be feminism, which is the main reason of the current birth rate collapse in the country, as well as liberalism in general. In recent years, Spain has become very left-wing on social issues, and in particular in what is today called “gender” stuff. They really are one of the most radical countries in Europe in that aspect. And what hope can there be for a country that doesn’t understand the basic things about Nature and doesn’t even care to propagate itself, outsourcing its own reproduction to foreigners?

    On the other hand, life is still good. The beach is not going anywhere, never mind the screams of the apocalyptical climate cultists. You can eat well for very reasonable prices. Economically, people complain about jobs but they don’t seem to be struggling. Catalonia appears to be doing pretty well compared to other regions of Spain. There’s little sign of social unrest, most migrants are slowly integrating or rather merging, and even the Catalan separatists quieted down a bit.

    There is no sign of a visible collapse anytime soon.

    Of course, sooner or later something is bound to happen. Liberalism is like a castle made of cards, it is just not sustainable in the long run.

    But we may all be dead before it happens.

    Paraphrasing T. S. Eliot, this is how the West will end, not with a bang, but with a whimper.

     

    1

    *I am trying to read or re-read a few classic books I missed in my youth, and this seemed an obvious choice. The insufferably pompous Nabokov once said something to the effect that he wouldn’t include a page of Dostoevsky in a compilation of Russian literature, but I could never finish any of his books except “Lolita”, and while certainly well-written, what is it but a story of pretty disgusting Epstein-style characters? Dostoevsky has many more memorable novels.

  • Articles

    "Everything is allowed"

    Brief thoughts on Dostoevsky and the modern world

    There’s a lot of doom in the Internet, especially among the alternative news crowd. People can’t get enough of the “end of the world/end of the West” type of thing. While I do understand that we are living in highly worrying times, with war expanding everywhere, economic downturn, birth rate collapse, mass migration, and radical technological and social changes, I try to avoid falling in the trap of looking only at the collapse, as there are occasionally good things too. Besides, it’s a bit depressive to only having to write about doom, gloom and conspiracy theories.

    Recently I’ve been doing much more reading than writing — I haven’t published a text here in months — and I decided to revisit classic novels, reading or re-reading them. I started, where else, with the Russians. I’ve recently finished Dostoevsky’s “The Brothers Karamazov” — it took me only forty years. I kid, but in fact I started reading this novel when I was 16 or 17, and never finished it. Then a few months ago, I found the book in my local library and decided to pick it up again, reading it all from the start. It took me just a couple of months. I really enjoyed it, so much so that I am reading Dostoevsky’s “The Idiot” now.

    The following is a somewhat disjointed digression about a famous sentence found in the Karamazov book — the text can also be watched in video form, perhaps it works better this way — and how it could apply to our current reality. Or not.


    “If there is no God, everything is allowed.”

    This sentence that became famous appears in the great novel by Fyodor Dostoevsky, “The Brothers Karamázov”, one of the greatest novels in the history of literature. A great, great book which I’ve only recently read. Without giving any spoilers, let’s just say that it is the story of three brothers with three very different personalities and destinies. Dmitri is the impulsive and reckless one, Alyosha is the moral and good-hearted one, and Ivan is the intellectual and cynical one. And Ivan is the one who says this sentence. 

    But what does it mean?

    It means that without God there are no moral rules, and man can do anything he wants. Rape, incest, murder. 

    “Do what thou wilt, that shall be the law”. 

    There are two consequences to this. One is that moral notions of good and evil have to come from God, from above. Otherwise it just comes from one man to another group of men, and it becomes merely a question of power. 

    The second part is that you should have clear, inflexible rules.”Thou shall not murder.” “Thou shall not covet thy neighbours’ wife”.  Otherwise, you have relativism. Or things like utilitarianism: “the greater good for the greater number of people”. 

    But then, if you have four people and three of them don’t like the fourth one, they can kill him, because that would be “the greater good for the greater number of people”, right? 

    And so we are back to “Everything is allowed.” 

    This idea comes, a bit, from Nietzsche’s sentence that “God is dead”, and the growing nihilism that was already at the time very noticeable in society, not just in Russia but in Europe in general. We are talking here about the late 19th century, when science was advancing, society was changing and more traditional notions of behaviour were starting to disappear.  

    The 20th century saw even greater changes, with feminism, the sexual revolution, the rise of modern democracy, and the further secularization of society, as well as incredible technological changes.   

    Today, things have gone much further. We live in times of extreme moral confusion, or maybe we should even say moral inversion. Good is called bad, and bad is called good. Black is called white, and white, black. Women are called men and men are called women. 

    Since we can’t even accept Nature as it is, the rules of society have become increasingly nonsensical. 

    As people are increasingly stabbed in the streets by foreigners, governments worldwide react by banning knives. Or scissors. Or hammers. 

    Or social media posts. 

    Newspapers were always full of lies, but, with the rise of modern digital mass media and now what is called, incorrectly, “Artificial Intelligence”, which further increases the possibilities of image manipulation, we don’t even know what is real and what isn’t. Perhaps we never knew. History was always written by the winners. Not everything we were told in school and history books was true. 

    Our leaders, the ones who should rule us and protect us, have become our worst enemies. There have always been tyrants, but this is probably the first time in history where there’s a whole worldwide government system that hates its population, or, at most, sees humans as replaceable cogs in a machine. Animals with no souls, to be hacked by vaccines and gene manipulation. 

    Even religious leaders offer little solace. Most of them are also part of this global system that wants to destroy traditional society in the name of a new global order. 

    What to do? How can we get rid of this evil global that seems to increasingly control everything and lead us into a global technological dystopia? 

    In Dostoevski’s novel, there is another character, called Father Zossima, a monk who is the mentor of the young Alyosha. And he says some interesting things which may be worth repeating. 

    At one point omeone asks him, “How can you prove that God exists?” And he says, well, you can’t. But if you love everyone and everything, if you spend your life actively loving your neighbours, one day, you will understand. But he warns that such love has to be active, real love. 

    Because the truth, as Dostoevsky observes in the novel, is that many people love humanity in the abstract, but they don’t really love humans. They just love a certain notion that they have about humanity, or perhaps they just love the idea of being considered a “good person”. 

    And so you have a lot of what we call virtue-signallers. People who like to appear as if they are noble or good and are always fighting for the right causes. But it is just status-mongering. It’s not real love. They love humanity as an abstract concept. But loving real people is hard. Most people are annoying or ungrateful. They lie, they cheat, they stink. When Jesus said that you should love your neighbour, he never said it would be easy. 

    Father Zossima also asks: “what is Hell?” And he says something very interesting. He says, “I maintain that Hell is the suffering of being unable to love.” And if we think about our rulers — and I don’t mean just the politicians, but the billionaires, the bankers, the real rulers behind the façade of the state — we see a lot of people that have a lot of power and riches. They have yachts, mansions, cars, women. But despite that, many of them don’t seem happy, and in fact many seem really wretched.  “What does it profit a man to win the whole world and lose his soul?” 

    They may have power, but they are unable to love their fellow human beings. And as such, they are in fact already living in hell. Because Hell is the suffering of being unable to love. If God’s love is the hidden grammar of the Universe, then Hell is being permanently away from it. 

    So what is the answer to our current troubles? The same one that ever was. Reject excessive materialism and consumerism. Try to avoid mass media, or, if you can’t at least be skeptical about it. Work, love your family, love the people close to you, help your community. Try to change yourself before attempting to change the world. 

    The current system is based on lies, and, as such, it can’t last long. It will end at some point, perhaps sooner than we all think. As Yeats said, “All things fall and are built again.” When the time comes, we have to be ready to build them again. 

  • Articles

    Notes from the end of the liberal order: Firenze

    Florence is forever, but the liberal order, probably not

    Godi, Fiorenza, poi che se’ sì grande,
    che per mare e per terra batti l’ali,
    e per lo ’nferno tuo nome si spande!

    (Dante, Inferno, Canto XXVI)

    The Americans

    After Spain, I came to Florence, for a brief course. I’m staying in a monastery of benedictine nuns that rents rooms, located right at the edge of town. Wonderful place with a wonderful view. The only thing ruining it so far is a small group of young, loud, obnoxious American tourists staying here as well.

    If I had my way, I would impose a moratorium of ten years for American tourists anywhere in Europe. Maybe a hundred years just in case, although it’s pretty unlikely that America as such will still exist in a hundred years.

    I may sound prejudiced, but if it wasn’t for America, Europe would be not an Uncle Sam colony, the Middle East would not be constantly being bombed with its refugees ending up in Europe, and extreme liberal ideas would not kept being pushed everywhere.

    Twice in my life I saw American tourists breaking spaghetti in half to cook it, under the horrified look of an Italian. I also saw once an American cooking spaghetti in a frying pan together with the vegetables and the sauce.

    But it’s not that they commit such culinary heresies. It’s their attitude. Ignorance is forgivable, but Americans believe that they are right even when they are wrong. When an Italian points out their mistake, they don’t really accept that it is a mistake, or perhaps they don’t even understand it. They laugh and think that the Italians are oversensitive foodies.

    They just cannot understand that things in other countries are done for a reason.

    Americans will not drink tap water in Italy, or anywhere outside of the U.S. It’s unsafe, they say. But, outside of India and Pakistan, it’s probably in the U.S. where tap water is the most dangerous.

    It’s not that it’s unclean. It’s not what they take away — it’s all that they put in. From fluoride to lithium to who knows what else, American tap water has more chemicals than the periodic table.

    While in the U.S. water fluoridation has been ongoing since the 1960s, polluting our precious bodily fluids (under the excuse of fighting tooth decay), in Italy, tap water has never been fluoridated. Nevertheless, according to a recent report, Italian children have less cavities than their American counterparts.

    What was the true motive for water fluoridation, then?

    Who knows, but don’t ask an American. He still believes in the official stories of 9/11, JFK, Covid, the moon landing, and, of course, water fluoridation.

    The Africans

    There’s a park in Florence where African migrants hang around, loitering, listening to loud rap, selling drugs and counterfeit bags. There’s probably a similar park in most European cities nowadays.

    In Barcelona, Latin Americans and Moroccans comprised most of the non-native population, but in Florence, after the American tourists, Africans seem to be the most visible foreign presence in the city. But, alas, unlike the former, the latter won’t go back to their countries as summer ends. Italy is stuck with them.

    Of course, there are also other Africans who integrate into the formal economy and work as waiters, bus drivers, nurses, lifesavers, and so on, but still, each day a new boat arrives and there’s no room for all, so some overflow into the parks.

    I mean, they are not dangerous, at least not so far, but they don’t seem to contribute much to the local economy, unless selling cheap counterfeit bags made by the Chinese counts as a contribution.

    The Chinese

    Which brings me to the Chinese. They are also numerous, but, being less loud than the Africans, they are not so noticed. They also concentrate in particular regions. It seems that Prato is almost half Chinese now. I wouldn’t know, I haven’t been there yet, but I can believe it.

    The Chinese at least are industrious and don’t tend to idly hang around in parks. They are good at doing business, and they do it from morning to night. The Jews of Asia, they say, although that might be an unfair characterization for both sides.

    It seems that a lot of “Italian” trinkets sold in souvenir shops, even if they say “made in Italy”, are made by the Chinese. In this case, Chinese migrants in Prato.

    But I like the Chinese. Once, and I told the story here before, a Chinese migrant gave me a ride to my hotel when there were no longer taxis or other form of transportation in town, and wouldn’t even accept money for it. I don’t think an American tourist would have done that.

    Also, I was confident enough to take a ride with a random Chinese migrant, but I don’t think I would if he was from any other nationality. Chinese and other Asians are trustworthy in that sense. I mean, I suppose that there are Chinese robbers, rapists, murderers or serial killers, but it’s not the first thing that comes to your mind.

    The Italians

    Now, first of all, let’s admit it, there is no such things as an “Italian people”. They don’t really exist. There’s Tuscans — subdivided in Florentines, Senese, Pisans, etc. — and Lombards, and Neapolitans, and Sicilians, and Sardinians, and so on.

    Don’t tell me that all of those groups form a single, unified people, regardless of what Garibaldi said.

    The Tuscans, and, in particular, the Florentines, are considered snobbish or arrogant, a bit like, say, the Parisians in France. “Hanno la puzza sotto il naso“, they say here. —they have their nose always turned up.

    There might be something to it, even though I haven’t noticed it. Curzio Malaparte, himself a Tuscan from Prato, wrote in “Maledetti Toscani” that Tuscans are the smartest people in Italy and that they do not suffer fools gladly, and that makes them hated by all the other Italians.

    That has not been my experience at all. If anything, the Tuscans I’ve met have been pretty kind, generous and even humble, very far from such stereotype.

    (I do think that might be true of the people of Milan, though.).

    The Liberal (Dis)Order

    Like in Spain, the Italian birth rate is also collapsing. Feminist propaganda is also very present, almost as much as in Spain. Wherever there’s feminism and liberalism, there’s birth rate collapse. Of course, there are many other reasons for it, as the phenomenon is present today in most countries, not all liberal democracies, but feminism, late marriages (or no marriage), abortion and birth control certainly play a role. After all, it’s women the ones who have (or do not have) babies.

    But the real problem of modern liberalism is simply that it doesn’t have an end or a goal — it just evolves to and further further radicalism, at the same time that it describes its critics as “radicals”.

    For instance, “Pope” Francis recently excommunicated his critic Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò, whom the media characterizes as “ultra-conservative”. But Viganò’s position is simply the same of any regular Catholic priest in 1962, prior to Vatican II. There’s nothing “radical” or “extreme” about it. It’s society, and the Church with it, which became more extreme, and continues to do so.

    And remember when Meloni was characterized as “far-right”? That didn’t age well.

    The other strange thing about the liberal order (some may call it the “new world order”) is how omnipresent it is. There is little room for variation. From increasing censorship in the name of “misinformation” to strange and possibly fake election results, it follows the same pattern of tricks everywhere.

    And yet, also here in Florence as in Barcelona, collapse does not seem to be coming any time soon. The city, despite the heat in these infernal summer months — certainly an inspiration for Dante — is bustling with activity and tourists. Not just loud, obnoxious Americans, but also obnoxious Germans, obnoxious Australians, obnoxious French.

    Dante wrote ironically that Florence’s fame grows even in Hell — in fact his Inferno is basically a list of famous florentines — and predicted that a great calamity sooner or later would strike the city as punishment for its many sins.

    Well, I suppose we’re more or less in the same situation in the West as a whole. Punishment will come, that much is certain. But who knows exactly when?

  • Articles

    Notes from the end of the liberal order: Spain

    Random thoughts on the collapse of the West or lack thereof

    I don’t know if anyone noticed, but I haven’t written much here. I spent the past couple of weeks visiting family in Spain, reading Brothers Karamazov1 on the beach and trying to forget about the state of the world. I was staying on a smaller location, about 20 minutes by train from downtown Barcelona, in a coastal region called El Maresme.

    And yet, how can you completely escape from the world? Even if you escape from it, it follows you. The local newspaper that I picked up at the nearby cafe, La Vanguardia, informed me that the Spanish birthrate has collapsed and that it is not going to come up again any time soon. Spanish people are just not having children or even marrying and, according to a recent study, in a decade or so a third of the households in Spain will be single-person.

    Meanwhile, migrants keep coming and while right now 21% of the residents of Catalonia are foreign-born — and that’s not counting those of migrant background but already born in Spain. This is likely to grow. More migrants will be coming, mostly from Morocco and Subsaharan Africa, but there are many coming from Latin America too. In fact, I was surprised at how many Latin Americans are there in Barcelona compared to 20 or even just 10 years ago.

    And yet, in a building just across from one of Gaudi’s masterpieces, I watched a conference by a famous Spanish journalist. At one point he said that “in the next decades, migrants from Africa and North Africa will comprise most of our population”, or something to that effect, but in a matter-of-factly tone. No one blinked. Everyone seemed to accept it as a given.

    And yet, when I looked at the audience, it was all white Spanish people — and mostly older folks too.

    Isn’t there a contradiction here?

    People expect that Spain will have a completely different population in fifty years, and things will work exactly the same way, but the audience seemed to show otherwise. Migrants don’t tend to go to Spanish journalists’ conferences. In the future, Spain — and large parts of Europe — will resemble more and more Latin America or perhaps North Africa in its dysfunction.

    And yet… Many right-wingers talk about such things as if society was on the verge of collapse, but I think that’s just exaggeration, or perhaps wishful thinking. Most countries in Latin America or North Africa haven’t collapsed yet. European countries seem still pretty chill, regardless of the occasional random “terrorist” attack (and some of those are probably staged by CIA/Mossad).

    It’s true that the current world order is mostly based on strange lies or utopian ideas — that all people are equal and replaceable, that sex differences don’t exist, that we need to wear masks to avoid viruses and suck carbon from the atmosphere and cut trees to “solve climate change” etc etc — and, as such, it cannot really go on forever. Nevertheless, it can still last for quite a while. After all, it took hundreds of years for the Roman Empire to fall. The Fall of the American Global Empire may take an even longer time.

    I don’t even think migration is the main problem in Spain. That would probably be feminism, which is the main reason of the current birth rate collapse in the country, as well as liberalism in general. In recent years, Spain has become very left-wing on social issues, and in particular in what is today called “gender” stuff. They really are one of the most radical countries in Europe in that aspect. And what hope can there be for a country that doesn’t understand the basic things about Nature and doesn’t even care to propagate itself, outsourcing its own reproduction to foreigners?

    On the other hand, life is still good. The beach is not going anywhere, never mind the screams of the apocalyptical climate cultists. You can eat well for very reasonable prices. Economically, people complain about jobs but they don’t seem to be struggling. Catalonia appears to be doing pretty well compared to other regions of Spain. There’s little sign of social unrest, most migrants are slowly integrating or rather merging, and even the Catalan separatists quieted down a bit.

    There is no sign of a visible collapse anytime soon.

    Of course, sooner or later something is bound to happen. Liberalism is like a castle made of cards, it is just not sustainable in the long run.

    But we may all be dead before it happens.

    Paraphrasing T. S. Eliot, this is how the West will end, not with a bang, but with a whimper.

    1

    *I am trying to read or re-read a few classic books I missed in my youth, and this seemed an obvious choice. The insufferably pompous Nabokov once said something to the effect that he wouldn’t include a page of Dostoevsky in a compilation of Russian literature, but I could never finish any of his books except “Lolita”, and while certainly well-written, what is it but a story of pretty disgusting Epstein-style characters? Dostoevsky has many more memorable novels.

  • Articles

    There is no freedom in the West

    Freedom is just another word for nothing left to lose

    For several weeks, protests against Israel’s campaign in Gaza have been ongoing at several American universities and a few European ones. It’s basically the same crowd of leftist students that protested for Black Lives Matters, for abortion or for other popular causes (but not against Covid lockdowns).

    But while those protests were accepted and even cheered by the establishment, and hardly anyone was arrested, now the police is coming in full force against the students. Some are being expelled from the university. Other have lost their jobs. A few were gassed or beaten up.

    It must have been quite a rude awakening.

    These are people who were brainwashed from childhood that the world is divided between “oppressors” and “oppressed”, so when they see unarmed women and children being bombed by a superior army, they naturally respond with indignation.

    But now they find out that, in this case, things are not so simple anymore.

    It is clear right now that are things you’re allowed to protest against — “white supremacy”, “patriarchy”, the Church — and things that you are not — vaccines, immigration, Israel.

    The protesters are being accused of being “anti-semitic”, but I doubt that they really are. Most of them support most Jewish causes and I am sure there are a few Jewish students among the protesters too (although a large part is likely of Arab origin).

    Politicians keep telling us that we have “freedom” in the West. In a way, it’s true.

    For instance, a man in Canada recently was free to ask a doctor to amputate two of his healthy fingers because of “body dysphoria”. He thought he was an amputee, so, using modern language, this was an “amputee-affirming” event.

    Another man was also free to declare himself as “non-binary” and to create an artificial “vagina”, but he also wanted to keep his penis just in case, because he wasn’t sure which “gender” he belonged to. So he obtained that right. And he even got the government, I mean, the Canadian taxpayers, to pay for the surgery.

    Meanwhile, also in Canada — one of the countries closest to being a modern liberal utopia — a physically healthy 27-year old autistic woman was also free to take part in the government’s “MAID” program — a cute acronym for “Medical Assistance in Dying” — against the wishes of her own parents, because, otherwise, according to the authorities, she would suffer “irreparable harm.”

    So you’re “free” to do any of those things in the modern Western world. Also to abort, smoke marihuana, and get married to your pet.

    But try to protest or even post something against verboten topics, and see where that takes you.

    Digital Slaves

    A few days ago, Amazon terminated my Kindle Direct Publishing account, where I self-published a few books, with no reason or warning. They just sent me an email informing that they believe I violated their “Terms of Service”, although they did not specify in which way. They cancelled my account, deleted all my titles from Amazon, forbade me to ever opening a new Kindle account, and are not even going to pay for the unpaid royalties that they owe me. I can’t even access my previous sales reports.

    I wrote several emails asking for more information as to why I was “canceled”, but got no answer. There is no way to contact them by phone either.

    Since I didn’t publish anything particularly divisive, and all titles were either under my own copyright or works in the public domain, it is unclear what I did wrong.

    I never made more than 30-50 dollars a month from those books, so it’s not a big deal. But it sobering to find out that they can just delete all your work in a matter of seconds, under any excuse.

    I never liked Amazon very much for the way they destroyed first local bookstores and now all kinds of local shops, but when you see how little they care for publishers who use their platform, it’s quite a shock.

    For the moment, I will be moving the books to Barnes & Noble and Apple Books.

    However, the same is true of any other digital platform. YouTube, Facebook, Twitter, Google, Apple. They can just close your account at any time for any reason. In the digital world, nothing belongs to you.

    And that’s just the start.

    You might remember that during the anti-lockdown protests in Canada, Justin Trudeau froze the bank accounts of several protesters. So they already can do that. But as the world moves to a digital currency, things are going to get worse. They will be able to just take away all your money with the push of a button, for any reason, just like Amazon did with my KDP account.

    The European Union is already moving into the direction of banning cash. There’s already a law being considered that would ban all individual cash transactions over 3,000 euros. The excuse is “terrorism”, but we all know the score.

    But hey, at least you are free to amputate any body part you want.